guglearth.blogg.se

1. #Slimjet vs slimbrowser update
2. #Slimjet vs slimbrowser portable
3. #Slimjet vs slimbrowser code
4. #Slimjet vs slimbrowser windows

Moreover, I was already used to using Internet Explorer, so why bother changing? There are a quite a few web browsers around these days and they mostly have their own good and bad points. I’m keeping an eye on Vivaldi, a Chromium based browser that is working on smoothing out the UI issues… they just got the classic menubar working properly in the most recent release, and at this rate, they may one day surpass Firefox proper (though probably never Waterfox).A few years back, I used Internet Explorer for better compatibility with a number of websites. I tried Chromium, but it was so lacking in its UI that I soon cut the test short. I was so disgusted by Mozilla’s continued efforts to copy Chrome that I decided to see what was so good that Firefox had to stop being Firefox to copy. I never tried Chrome or any variants thereof until this year, 2019. I did try IE7 briefly, but it was seriously wanting compared to Firefox, and that was the last IE version I tried.

#Slimjet vs slimbrowser windows

Because of Microsoft’s behavior, I never seriously considered using IE 6 for anything other than updating Windows XP. I kept with Netscape until Microsoft had them destroyed, at which time I moved to Netscape’s offspring, Mozilla. I used Netscape 2.0 or so with Windows 3.1, then when I got Windows 95 OSR2, I tried the included IE 3.0, but I didn’t like it as much as Netscape. I never used IE, even then, except for Windows updates and brief testing.

Meanwhile, the perfectly functional Malwarebytes v1.75.x has a legitimate iexplore.exe (digitally signed by Malwarebytes) at: C:\Program Files (x86)\Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware\Chameleon\iexplore.exe BriskBard () - web browser/ email client/ feed reader/ IRC chat client/ multimedia player installer build uses IE’s Trident & Chromium’s Blink for rendering.Tablacus Explorer (latest release: ) - tabbed file manager.Some Internet Explorer-dependent applications not mentioned in the Wiki list include:. I’m also concerned about WebbIE (latest release: ), which caters to visually-impaired users. Skype, Steam client & the unofficial Winamp probably have significant number of users.

#Slimjet vs slimbrowser update

Moreover, many of the listed applications are still actively being developed to this day, such as Skype, Maxthon, Sleipnir, SlimBrowser, WebbIE, Steam client, & Winamp (community update build).

Meanwhile, others like SlimBrowser (initial release: Dec 2012) & UltraBrowser (initial release: Sep 2009) did not exist during the Windows 2000 era. The aforementioned Wiki entry is meant to be a historical record, so some of the listed applications are old. That list is old, from the Windows 2000 era. So perhaps it’s only a matter of time before malicious actors come up with payloads that target Win Explorer & IE-dependent applications. PS: In Win 7, Windows Explorer (which uses IE’s binaries) works just fine with IE “turned off” (ie. Here’s a non-exhaustive list of 3rd-party web browsers & non-browser applications that use IE for various purposes. The user can no longer launch it, but its web browser engine remains operational for applications that use it. Starting with Windows 2000, it is possible to disable Internet Explorer. That being said, to avoid a false sense of security … As such, with the system’s “default” IE being disabled from launching, it is impossible for any malicious hyperlink to open any web browser w/o triggering a “ Windows can’t open this file” prompt.

#Slimjet vs slimbrowser portable

I use portable 3rd-party web browsers, & to prevent registry entries, I do NOT set any browser as default.

After a reboot, it is no longer possible to launch IE in any way.

#Slimjet vs slimbrowser code

NET implementation of JScript) ? Is it vulnerable to the latest zero-day remote code execution vulnerability ?Īnother precautionary measure I’d taken is to disable the IE browser via ‘ Turn Windows Features on or off‘. Since I use portable 3rd-party media players, I’m fine with leaving jscript.dll in its restricted crippled state.īut what about (basically the the. removing SYSTEM user’s permissions from IE’s 32/64-bit jscript.dll- will break the respective 32/64-bit Windows Media Player in Win 7.Ĭlicking on any video/audio file will lead to the “ Server execution failed” error, while clicking wmplayer.exe will result in no response. For instance, the workaround recommended for mitigating the latest zero-day IE vulnerability - ie.